Comments on: My PureMVC presentation http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=my-puremvc-presentation Flash and Everything Else Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:35:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: @diomampo http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-447 @diomampo Sun, 11 Apr 2010 02:00:40 +0000 http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-447 @Guya I just wanted to give some props on the slides and comments. I'm going to be giving a presentation on PureMVC later this month, and it's been a part of my toolkit for over a year. Although other platform specific frameworks exist, it's nice to know I have a head start when moving to another language. Cheers @Guya
I just wanted to give some props on the slides and comments. I’m going to be giving a presentation on PureMVC later this month, and it’s been a part of my toolkit for over a year. Although other platform specific frameworks exist, it’s nice to know I have a head start when moving to another language.

Cheers

]]> By: guya http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-446 guya Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:54:40 +0000 http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-446 @Amit, LoL :) @Matti, Its popularity is not the main reason why one should choose PureMVC. It's only the reason why a relatively new framework like Mate won't be accepted in some cases. The most popular framework is obviously still cairngorm. Most enterprise applications, but not only, either already use caringrom, or will agree to adopt it. After all, this is the official framework from Adobe. The only alternative to Carnigrom in the enterprise space, unless you're the owner and do what ever you want, is PureMVC. PureMVC is all that you described and more. Personally, I don't prefer generated code (MXML), and I like the idea of being able to use the same good paradigm for my Flash and Flex applications. Not saying that Mate is no good, it have some advantages, and I might use it myself sometime. The thing about humans is that we all like to take sides, I'm not gonna swear upon PureMVC, but currently it's still my preference. @Amit, LoL :)

@Matti,
Its popularity is not the main reason why one should choose PureMVC. It’s only the reason why a relatively new framework like Mate won’t be accepted in some cases. The most popular framework is obviously still cairngorm. Most enterprise applications, but not only, either already use caringrom, or will agree to adopt it. After all, this is the official framework from Adobe.
The only alternative to Carnigrom in the enterprise space, unless you’re the owner and do what ever you want, is PureMVC.

PureMVC is all that you described and more.
Personally, I don’t prefer generated code (MXML), and I like the idea of being able to use the same good paradigm for my Flash and Flex applications.

Not saying that Mate is no good, it have some advantages, and I might use it myself sometime.

The thing about humans is that we all like to take sides, I’m not gonna swear upon PureMVC, but currently it’s still my preference.

]]> By: Shvilam http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-445 Shvilam Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:51:15 +0000 http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-445 I believe in the wisdom of many especially in those staff like "shwarma" kiosk i all way go to the most corded one. I believe in the wisdom of many
especially in those staff
like “shwarma” kiosk i all way go to the most corded one.

]]> By: Flashmattic http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-444 Flashmattic Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:29:28 +0000 http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-444 Guy, The thing is, that the argument "what is the most spreaded framework" simply doesn't hold water. I don't really care what is the most popular one, since I'm not in high scholl anymore. All I want is a simple framework that will get the work done, will not be intrusive to my app, be easily maintained, well documented and easy to use. PureMVC is not all that... MATE comes closer. there is an inflation in Flex frameworks and it starts to harm those who choose badly. Guy,
The thing is, that the argument “what is the most spreaded framework” simply doesn’t hold water. I don’t really care what is the most popular one, since I’m not in high scholl anymore. All I want is a simple framework that will get the work done, will not be intrusive to my app, be easily maintained, well documented and easy to use.
PureMVC is not all that… MATE comes closer. there is an inflation in Flex frameworks and it starts to harm those who choose badly.

]]> By: shvilam http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-443 shvilam Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:08:52 +0000 http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-443 thanks guy I will try to write a post of my won that will display the a same uml diagram of our system in pureVMC when i will finish design it thanks guy
I will try to write a post of my won that will display the a same uml diagram
of our system in pureVMC
when i will finish design it

]]> By: guya http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-442 guya Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:29:26 +0000 http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-442 The problem with commands is that sometimes a command can get too complex and handle too much logic. You should probably split it into multiple commands and run it sequentially if needed. It will result in a lot more commands which can be organize neatly inside their related folders. A mediator can control a complex UI control and also multiple controls. If you have too many of these than put it in related folders. Personally, I'm not afraid of lots of commands etc', if it's organized and the naming is good enough, you'll be fine. If after all things are too complex than you should probably think of splitting it into modules. Same old guideline, if it get too complex than split it. The problem with commands is that sometimes a command can get too complex and handle too much logic. You should probably split it into multiple commands and run it sequentially if needed. It will result in a lot more commands which can be organize neatly inside their related folders.

A mediator can control a complex UI control and also multiple controls. If you have too many of these than put it in related folders.

Personally, I’m not afraid of lots of commands etc’, if it’s organized and the naming is good enough, you’ll be fine.

If after all things are too complex than you should probably think of splitting it into modules.
Same old guideline, if it get too complex than split it.

]]> By: shvilam http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-441 shvilam Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:35:04 +0000 http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-441 Yes you are right about that mogobe is a pure flash application (using flex builder) And as i wrote before what is interesting is how you implement pureVMC in your application most of the code example take just a one pice of it with one or 2 mediators but how thing are going when you have hundreds of different commands and Thanks for the link Yes you are right about that mogobe is a pure flash application
(using flex builder)

And as i wrote before what is interesting is how
you implement pureVMC in your application
most of the code example take just a one pice of it with one or 2 mediators
but how thing are going when you have hundreds of different commands

and Thanks for the link

]]> By: guya http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-440 guya Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:08:31 +0000 http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-440 That's what is good about PureMVC there are a lot of examples and tutorials out there. Correct me if I'm wrong, but, mogobe.com seems like a pure Flash application. What I like about PureMVC is that it's great for Pure Flash (none Flex) applications as well. http://puremvc.org has a lot of articles and examples. This is a good example of developing a Pure Flash modular application using PureMVC: http://www.as3dp.com/2009/07/22/a-non-flex-actionscript-example-of-a-puremvc-multicore-application/ I will post some examples of my own, I believe. That’s what is good about PureMVC there are a lot of examples and tutorials out there.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but, mogobe.com seems like a pure Flash application.
What I like about PureMVC is that it’s great for Pure Flash (none Flex) applications as well.

http://puremvc.org has a lot of articles and examples.

This is a good example of developing a Pure Flash modular application using PureMVC:
http://www.as3dp.com/2009/07/22/a-non-flex-actionscript-example-of-a-puremvc-multicore-application/

I will post some examples of my own, I believe.

]]> By: Shvilam http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-439 Shvilam Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:51:24 +0000 http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-439 I will try in English I am as well starting my first PureMVC project and it will be great if you will write more about your implementation of PureMVC I will try in English
I am as well starting my first PureMVC
project and it will be great if you will write more about
your implementation of PureMVC

]]> By: guya http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-438 guya Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:49:24 +0000 http://blog.guya.net/2009/09/29/my-puremvc-presentation/#comment-438 @Matti, Mate indeed looks promising as some of the other new frameworks out there. But when trying to pitch a framework, you'll most certainty will be asked: Can you prove that this framework has been used in a lot of enterprise applications? You'll have no problem saying yes when it comes to cairngorm, Adobe can help you do it. You'll be able to prove it as well when it comes to PureMVC. I'm not sure about the other frameworks. @Matti,

Mate indeed looks promising as some of the other new frameworks out there. But when trying to pitch a framework, you’ll most certainty will be asked:
Can you prove that this framework has been used in a lot of enterprise applications?
You’ll have no problem saying yes when it comes to cairngorm, Adobe can help you do it. You’ll be able to prove it as well when it comes to PureMVC. I’m not sure about the other frameworks.

]]>